Monday, January 28, 2013

Sign Language Isn’t Only for the Deaf, Part I: Personal Experience, Definition, and History

Even in our modern age, I find there is still a general assumption that ASL (American Sign Language) or any sign language is only for the Deaf. So, in an attempt to educate and enlighten, I am writing numerous blogs about this subject. Since there is such an overwhelming amount of information on sign language, I will only provide you with digestible amounts in each blog. This first part contains a short explanation of my history with it, followed by a description and brief history of sign language.

In September 2011 I wrote a blog titled Another Voice that touched upon my personal experience with sign language. I wanted to learn it as soon as I lost my ability to speak when I was a pre-teen, around 1960. At the time my parents couldn’t accept that there was anything wrong with my speech and wouldn’t let me learn sign language. I, however, accepted my condition from the minute my voice changed and from that moment on I knew I needed help for it. I believed that sign language could give me that help. It would never give me a normal voice, but it would give me what we all want and need. Communication. (See: http://princessfrogspeaks.blogspot.com/2011_09_01_archive.html)

Decades later, I learned ASL and I have been teaching it to deaf and hard-of-hearing children for the last five years. In addition, I have the privilege to work with children who are not deaf but, for one reason or another, cannot or do not speak. When I am with them, I am reminded of myself as a child – feeling helpless and frustrated because I lacked the ability to communicate. With this in mind, I try to teach these children signs as well.

The children that I work with and I are living proof that sign language helps the voiceless. Yet, although it is a full, living language, many people don’t understand what it is.

Sign language is not gesturing. A gesture is a nonverbal way to communicate with the face, hand, or other body part, but these movements are culture-specific. So, the significance of most gestures depends on where they are used. In the language of signs, the hands, arms, face and body are specifically oriented to say something that will be understood the same wherever that specific sign language is used. About 200 sign languages exist in the world today. Wherever deaf people live you will find them in one form or other. Some are legally recognized, and others are not. Like English or any other official language, sign languages have a complete and unique structure. One can discuss anything using sign language. One cannot do this with gestures. Gestures are random movements and, unlike sign language, they are not part of any standardized or official form.

No one knows who invented sign language but, according to Deaf scholar Paddy Ladd, “… aboriginal Australians have the oldest sign languages – some 80,000 years.”

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_language, “One of the earliest written records of a sign language occurred in the fifth century BC.” This was in Plato's Cratylus where Socrates says: "If we hadn't a voice or a tongue, and wanted to express things to one another, wouldn't we try to make signs by moving our hands, head, and the rest of our body, just as dumb people do at present?”

Aristotle, Plato’s famous student, thought that the deaf could never speak and that speaking and hearing originated from the same area in the brain. This led him to assume that, if one function was impaired, the other must be too. Based on this, Aristotle believed that a deaf person could not learn. It wasn’t until 700 A.D. when the archbishop of York officially refuted Aristotle's theory.

Many centuries passed before anyone noteworthy publicly commented on what the archbishop thought. Finally, in the sixteenth century, Geronimo Cardano (the first physician to describe typhoid fever) said that deaf people could be taught without knowing how to speak. Cardano used a method of writing that involved icons. He taught this system to his deaf son and this led to the first book on teaching sign language to deaf people, in 1620.

Then in 1755 the Abbe de L’Epee founded the first free school for the deaf in Paris. Here the deaf were taught the sign language system that the Abbe developed, where each symbol suggested the desired concept. Almost 150 years later, though, a book called Observations of a Deaf-Mute by Pierre Desloges claimed that the Abbe wasn’t the inventor he had claimed to be. Deaf since the age of seven, Desloges wrote that signing, like the Abbe had taught, had been how deaf Parisians communicated way before the Abbe took credit for his “methodical signs” and founded his school. However, the Abbe’s prominence and his efforts in promoting a highly structured sign language served the deaf community greatly. It paved the way for the recognized sign languages that we have today. (See: http://www2.uic.edu/stud_orgs/cultures/daa/ASLHistory.html)

Like other languages, sign language is full of history and all kinds of interesting characters. For me, though, its sheer nature dramatically points out the power of our instinctual need to communicate. As Victor Hugo said in 1845, “What matters deafness of the ear, when the mind hears. The one true deafness, the incurable deafness, is that of the mind.” I look forward to sharing my future blogs on sign language with you. I hope these will help to deepen our understanding of the simple truth that all of us, Deaf and non-Deaf alike, are given a mind and it is the most natural thing in the world for us to want to express it.





No comments:

Post a Comment